Post Election

88 Keys ! 
That is 44 x* 2 ?
The energy was amazing!
Now for cracking the code, or my Maddowian reference**(knock on wood), but I will leave it to Paul Harvey.  The rest of the story.  There is Romnesia and there is the Arithmatic. 
Something Too Point Oh?  Or Owe?  Two out of three be bad branches. 
Speaking of Maddow and the gang(Ed, Al, Lawrence, etc) I can only weave so much !  ***

* arrived late, left early, but got a pic with Norm, won a book, and booked. 
** it was noisy, I fumbled my words, but we R R now Beyond the Norm.
***  doe$ that dog hunt? (I had to parse my inserts carefully[!])
[Conn, Kennedy, Bane Or(Tan Gent)]
[Bottom Line: Mr. President! Begin with your budget^ and your jobs bill on the table, before any grand B.S. ]

^ You know, the one that Romney said was part of everything that you had your way. 

11-9-12 (update)  Xfinity #9



11-22-12 [C-VC]
12-7-12 update: [listening to AM1090 online,
the following pic scrolled by as the 1st of 5 from 88Keys.
FYI, later scroll expanded to 240 or so pics.]

Clear Eyes,

Full Hearts, Can't Use* ?

It is unclear what the Romney ticket is going with, Mo'better Bush or Mo'better Obama, but certainly not No Drama Either or is it ether?  Somewhere the Romney/Ryan/RNC use of the term quarterback escapes me.  Even if it was just me, I think that Monday morning or anyday other day than game day is their style. 

* was going to go with caffeinated but that was too Mormoney. 

(Tagg we are it ?)
Replacement Refs or Not...  (Bu' dump 'ump [!] ... ** )

===============
10-18-12
RETRO_SEG_WAY?
UNCLE SAM KNOT?
Or Fair and Balanced, not ? !
Or Just US!
=========

** updated, Thom Hartmann(Bu'), Norman Goldman(Dump), Randi Rhodes ('ump) (Bu' dump 'ump)/Re:tale.
Re:R,R,R A - R(not exactly) (j, k, l, m, n, o, p, q, r )

Not to Dump on Norman Goldman(nor Republicans), he is describing RepubliCONS as smart and fighting like cats and dogs over congress, while compromise is only for the president as candidate.  He makes further cracks about the difficulties of Bozo John Boehner as House Speaker in hurding*** them. (my paraphrasing & rhetorical metamorphing.)

*** circular firing rhetorical metaphors(cats and dogs)
(Obama has a better record given his opposition, Romney had to cooperated with a 78% Democratic legislature which has the power.***) Yeah that asterisk is redundant... who needs Republicans when ...  democracy is all over the map?)

[Bin Go ! Who let  the names out? Con $(c)ent Ration ? (C S c R !) ]

Flip-Flop, Nuance, Mitt-Flop

Kerry, Obama, RawMoney...
Etch-a-sketch [!]

Pressler, Foreign Policy !
American Exceptionalism:
Exception to the rule, or rule without exceptionalism?

Mitt-Flop On !

Update Charts !
Images ?
NOT 

Nor Foul nor Foot Bowl.




















10-16-12  Sometimes I feel like a...
 Tea-Partier, sometimes a We Gee Bored[!]
Butt 4 the perspective* !
* not the link, I am still looking for one shared on other thread w/ comment.
[The word comprehensive and dimentionalism are key.  Apologies for Obtuseness, or vice verse us ? ]

Tacky, tact, tack...

Who let the Dogfish* out?
Apology Cruise?

* not exactly [!]

Apology Cruise?  First, a Dogfish is a shark and I must admit to participating in their demise as a fisherman.  A billy-club or gaff hook is the tool of choice.  Second, Akin to fishing trips or the Romney Embassy gaff is Juan Coles hook to "Jumping the Shark".  Irony of Wrong Knees**, "legitimate rape" is almost long forgotten, what with the "empty chair" and the "Leder" Twain. 

** I am not implying Right or Wrong, only Diploma See.^

^ of Right and Wrong
S.E. Cupp
Evan Kohlmann

[9-20-12: or non-Prof-etiq et tu?  AM Clint 'n's Worlds?]

Off the Cuff

Or the bottom line ?
Only the twain?

See Label
(I pun on the Mark Leder Tapes)
I know it is inarticulate, but I like his style.  He does his own warm up act, but less than 3 minutes in he frames the future as "China working with us" or "something like Europe"...

See [Fog of Math!?]
Re: Off Track

The Trouble with the Mitt:
His 47% rant is political.  
His MC hammer is off. 
Not to pun on the MC but his nail is the 96%!

There is the trouble with his charts,


trouble with his "entitles"



and trouble both domestic















 and foreign.

I may be forgetting something but I shall probably return.

Re:Focus

TIME is not on anyone's side.

(NFRY)
related links : Joe Klein
Paralysis Rules
One for All and All for One
Is Romney a Realist or an Idealist?
Paul Ryan's Grand Vision
The Trouble with Simpson-Bowles

(fn) not yet

[Re-visit ! ?]

[Re:Boot ?]

[Let her role ?^^ ]
AM ?
NOW ?
Mitt-matic ?
Cheese US ?
Or Bane^ ? !
Or Diploma See!

^ The Best Defense(Mine'd Hive?)
^^ But a blimp[!] The Mark Leder Twain.

[Fog of Math!?]
[Brass Balls? Or Dorothy's Slippers?]

Trouble with the Curve?

 

W'rithmatic and the Empty Chair.
It's Marvelous! *


Obama is 4... the 96%!

*not an endorsement


Waaaaa!!!!!  ;-): 

The Top 5%** income brackets pay 38% of total taxes collected on 35% of the nations income, while the bottom 95% pay ONLY 62% of taxes on 64% of the nations total income[!***]




** thanks to Jared Bernstein's colleagues and Citizens for Tax Justice.
*** real math is not that inciteful !

Politics is local?

Ground Game ? *

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/fact-checker/post/an-embassy-statement-a-tweet-and-a-major-misunderstanding/2012/09/12/a2d32a8c-fd24-11e1-b153-218509a954e1_blog.html

http://open.salon.com/blog/ted_frier/2012/09/12/losing_gop_in_denial_over_own_failures
http://www.salon.com/2012/09/10/why_i_left_the_gop/

http://www.salon.com/2012/09/12/mitt%E2%80%99s_shameful_libya_statement/
http://theweek.com/article/index/233148/the-death-of-an-american-in-libya

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/fact-checker/post/an-embassy-statement-a-tweet-and-a-major-misunderstanding/2012/09/12/a2d32a8c-fd24-11e1-b153-218509a954e1_blog.html

http://www.salon.com/2012/09/13/cairo_embassys_statement_what_went_wrong/

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3032608/ns/meet_the_press-meet_the_press/vp/48959856/#48959768 ***

Not the usual MO.** 

[ http://blog.seattlepi.com/seattlepolitics/2012/09/13/house-race-koster-opts-for-the-full-romney/ ]

*Scroll over is sufficient until [fn] and post /under-construction(also redux labels) R done.
** "well" not exactly [!]

*** dropped link [!]

[Unfinished read, refinished read.(perspectivism) Politics over war.  Obama has made progress in foreign policy, but Republicans want to take it back.  The wars in Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Egypt, and Iran(an evolution) are the examples of diplomacy(d) over preemption.  It all sprung from the 2000 election debacle, resistance to Clinton policy and the failure on September 11th with the supposed post-9-11 world.  But it is spelled out in the perspective that we cannot expect to teach democracy or politics over there, without practicing it over here(^).  I will refrain from further tangents or links on this post, but I will note that the two reads just mentioned also reflect a bit of a balancing act that is not nearly as cut and dry as it might be written.  One of the key differences in the big picture that makes the previous administration a stand out failure in American History is the combination of the voodoo(b) economics(arithmatic/fuzzy math+fuzzy English) with the neo-con perspective of American Exceptionalism (which is not) exemplified by choosing a war without paying for it.  The success that is so difficult is because politics is local except for them^(f).  This is demonstrated by the current Radical Republican opposition(c) to the Arab Spring,^^^ which removed dictators and is allowing(a) for democracy that might not turn out to be to our liking.  Bush said war is hard work, but just because you want to fight, does not mean that progress and peace(with diplomacy and politics) are not harder work, and more profitable.  That is part of true exceptionalism.

^refrain from a bumber snicker]

9-15-12
(a) FOX wrong about Libya says McCain.
(b) Foreign policy is Bane of Politics: bankruptcy bailout business not an option in either.
(c)  Loose lips? Republican Threat to National Security
(d) not! but whiney!

(^) ibid re^frain [see (d)]

9-17-12 (e) not embedded  i.e. that's right, there is no (e)
Seriously [!] folks ?
[^^ Apologies for sarcasm, but there is a diversity of reliability in the perspectives/sources provided.]
[NOW^^^ w/Alex Wagner w/Martin Basher on America Abroad.^^ But natural track of changing the strategy for Romney of change or status quo. i.e. hijacking change and boogieman status quo. Cam-Pain not working, Obama not running.]
[There is an (f) ]
^^ viscous cycle of anachronism
^^^ then Martin Bashir (NeoMitt)(Mittastrophe of asterisked?)

Rhetorical Been Laden[*] In-Chief

Raw Money ? [!]*
Or #2 man ?

[Actually I take a punt a bit far, but the Monday mourning quarterback is a field goal** behind.  I had earlier reacted to Romney not even being a water boy with his arithmatic***.]
[Or Rowdy Yeats ?]
[Been gone ? ]

* exception to the punctuation ?
** belated insert
*** also belated premption
[The domestic threat the GOP is over here is taken over there.]

[*] 9-14-12 asterisk added for English emphasis not bill yards.

[fn / under construction]

Refrain Post Frain?

It seems to come almost naturally to some***.  You might ask, what?  I won't go there, nor refrain.
Tan Gent not implied*, but it is a bit like a satire of a mockery. 
So here are some unread links to file for later.
Dangerous Narratives
Whose Maker
Obama Role
The Bounce?

* anachronism intended

Footnotes** Change

** click Footnotes for details

*** exception to the rule(bottom line) [Footnotes** Change] appropriately
i.e. yet to footnote but what the google[anachronism unintended] or is it?
[Not so RawMoney.]
[Ed Word]

[fn] Re:**

Fall-Awful on Mitt's Face!

The eleventh anniversary of September 11th had not yet passed when it was announced[^] that American embassies were under attack. 

Over this lede is the heading*[^^] that we need to turn around.***  It is bad enough that business is not the experience we need in the executive branch, but it certainly is not the same as diplomacy.** 

And foreign policy is really up there when it comes to trickle-down on the bottom line. But it really is more of a climate study with seeds of clouds so to speak and not passing the buck.[^^^] 

*Heading is the top line: Fall-Awful on Mitt's Face!
** Bush League Revisited?
*** apologies for Iron Knee or embedded nuance?

[^]9-13-12 due to update the link is not the earliest
[^^] my original source
[latest]

[Retro footnotes: scroll over for uncrossrhodes GPS.]

[fn]

HiTetra!

An uncross rhodes of:
High Ate Us*
&
Tetra Heed Ron?**

Not to mention European[!]
And American Exceptionalism.


*speaking of Al Gore (v. doll) Rhythms
** my original intent ? 
X***
Y
Z
dt?

[!] = cubed?

*** not 2 we gee!
[actually not too kill two birds, but:
A. the "not" Thom Hartmann video s/b updated to 8-30
B.  so 2 the "too".]

[Plainly: Drifter *(my B.P. was originally 8-30)
Lastly: C-Level  See sarcasm of lifting boats also 8-30.]

[Twain ** & *** is a trippy 4a,
 but I must footnote 2d, or we've 2 ideas.  A.  bailouts  B.  bushes and birds  Not to be three B Nor are R R. BTW: literally but I will QL that...]

More Money?

They say G*d works in mysterious ways. 
Aside from who "they" are, does he hide in plane* sight?

Now I will un-rove bUy burying some ledes.
I have already headed off a punch line.

Speaking of (GPS)... is it ad lib or un add con? (or unicorn?)

*"plane" asterisk
*plain pun
Try Knitty?

[Not to be snarky, but MOReMONey?]

Give us a brake?

[Originally Posted evening 8-30-12]
Raw Hide!
OK, the RNC convention is over. 
It is hard to say much about the Clint Eastwood performance. 
Was he in character, or was he just acting his age? 
It was a good performance, but the Romney camp has defended it as an ad lib.
It was a break from the rest of the speeches, except for the empty chair. 
Rachel Maddow is reporting it as wierd.  I would give it more credit.
They are saying that much will be made of the Clint Eastwood performance. 
Which will detract from the other so-called messengers of the convention.
So much of the convention were good performances, if you forget that governing does not go by a script. 

[8-31-12]
The above** might not be my usual script.  But is less or more* a Charlotte's Web.
"Move em up!" might have been its original heading, but it is lost on the edit-room floor. 
"Give us a brake?" is the pun on the break or the foot in the mouth on the brake?
The point is what is the point.  And it's politics, not its politics.***

*Mitt Flop=?[!]=meaning? Not!
**written "as is" 8-30-12[UPDATE]
*** "Stunk and White(and Angell)"[!]?

[Note the simplicity of the bottom line(see bold ** to*** of text ).  Note the elements over the style. Not exactly a pun, far from Socratic.  A bit more Platonic, less Pythagorian, not exactly by the book as for the "Elements...(or)Style". See turn around and braking script or characters. Don't scratch too deep.  Or is it scroll ?]


[Footnote: I really should brake and change gears, but here I note that I may later insert links beyond the original raw hide.  BTW:  I know the series was one word, but it is the way I literally rove and un-rove.  

Network Coverage Etch-A-Sketch 3.0

I am not listening so you won't have to. 
But others R.**


Apologies (Or Apollo / Gees) for Scubby Ski-doo Math.
I may have lost track with Mitt, Ann, Ryan and the RNC-Con.
While we may have piqued, at reigning dogs and cats weak.*
"There he(I) goes again."

*Sharks week, Whether week***, Convention Weeks.(Peaks and Peeks)
** R, R  (Ammo Ann and Chris Christie)
*** not what I was fishing 4

10-29-12 In "F" able update.

Jumping the Shark?

FOX so you don't have to...
Newshounds.us
Comic con:
so you* might have to.


Not to dock you mock ...** but Obama will be speaking on Education today.
Not that it was where I was going, but I did google*** the lede.

* put your hand in the hand
** not to skirt the tangent
*** see 2nd "have to" maybe.

GPS of sorts, (not to cross the road but Alex Wagner NOW(p.f. ) mentions the Sissy Fee 'n Task.)
scroll up 'n over, above the art:
Daily Kos, Medicare(so you don't) paraphrase.
youtube, Put your hand...
Robot 6 (art)
Robot 6 (heading)
Newshounds: Akin Redemption
Rationalwiki: FOX

[later: heading NFRY]
[AM: congressional under water]

Footnote:  the Hinge Pin(Not!)...to pun but to point out that it is about having it your way and if the beef (Ctrl F) is on the table, and if the Republicans have been at the table or under the table.
Tip a canoe or K-dense you? 
Mitt 'n Raw Money and Lyin' too.

(p.f.) [post footnote: panel pledge plan pols parsing or seg way ... to this AM?(or off target?) not including News Nation or more on Re-Cycle nor to pun nor pre-empt?]
MBakin to Anti(p.p.f) -Thetical.]
(p.p.f.: Martin Bashir "politics ain't bean ball" ) Martin Bingo!

[8-22-12: Speaking of* cultural metaphors.(Rachel Maddow) ]
R,R,R, or ouch, ouch, ouch.**




*b.s."privitization" Ctrl F order lost mo
** what is truly remarkable about this cartoon( or as Romney would say: Marvelous) is that it just arrived by email with link for Pete sake.

9-4-12 No dis. IsIs?  For rob sake?



Rubber/Glue "Unhinged".

The debate we want to have ? !
Scroll up the trickle down*:
The Bully Pour** Pit.

* links bottom up
! Daily KOS
? USA Today
The Ed Show - Ryan v. Ryan: Who to believe?
TheLiaisonReport: Republicans Cuts and Runs
MSNBCTV: Chain Reaction
TheLiaisonReport: Now the Un-Voodoo Math
OurFuture.org - The Latest Lie: Obama Cut Medicare
MSNBCTV: Breaking News Ryan Choice

** Taxing Questions: Ammunition***Ann
(See Poor Pit # WOE WAY)
*** MO for * not extended to other links,
though scroll over will help ** pour[!]

[Some people can't handle the pour.  It is a viscous cycle.]
[Ideology Lost or Found ?]

[AM: Re-hinged from the fire into the pan, or from New Economic Thinking to Old Milton Friedmanism.  Or "going4(cf)broke" where(cf)= Ctrl F "boon"= business / governing .]

Now the Un-Voodoo Math

Re: tired Rhetorical Run A Round?
I said it so: Mo Jo!
And way mo !

RawMoney Lyin' 2012
or
RobMe Lyin' 2012

Bumber Snickers versus Balanced Solutions
Blog Search versus Bowles Simpson
No b.s. / Ouch!

Pre-selection references:
1-30, (Wisconsin)
3-20,  (AP-Paul-ING Susan)
4-4, (Social Darwinism)
4-5,* (Marvelous MR**PR)
4-10, (legislative experience)
4-30, (Ryan Shrugged)
7-10 (Ryan/Bane)

Speaking of Re-tired, the Romney/Ryan 2012 is no b.s. 

* Not that it is all math.